Home/Tobacco liability
Tobacco industry accountability

Hold the tobacco industry to account.

Liability can help governments hold the tobacco industry responsible for harms and costs caused by its products and conduct.

Who is the tobacco industry?

Start by identifying the actors behind tobacco-industry interests.

Companies, affiliates, lobbyists and other actors may shape markets, public narratives and policy environments.

Identify tobacco industry actors
Why liability matters

Harms, costs and conduct at issue

Tobacco products and industry conduct generate health, economic, environmental, social and governance harms and costs.

Healthcare and economic costs

Public systems absorb direct and indirect costs linked to tobacco use.

Healthcare expenditureProductivity lossesCost recovery

Youth, nicotine, mental health and novel products

Nicotine dependence and evolving products create new challenges for health and regulation.

Youth addictionMental healthNovel products

Environment, waste and livelihoods

Production and consumption generate environmental costs across supply chains and communities.

Tobacco-product wastePolluter paysFood systems

Human rights and labour harms

Liability can intersect with rights, labour conditions and harms within tobacco supply chains.

Right to healthChild labourWorker harms

Tax avoidance, evasion and illicit trade

Financial and trade practices can undermine public revenue and tobacco-control objectives.

Tax avoidanceTax evasionIllicit trade

Industry interference, misconduct and deception

Policy influence and misleading claims can delay or weaken effective public-health action.

LobbyingCSRGreenwashingMisleading consumers
How Article 19 can be implemented

Article 19 pathways

Article 19 calls on Parties to consider legislative action or promote existing laws to deal with criminal and civil liability, including compensation where appropriate.

Later COP decisions and Expert Group work have advanced administrative and other non-judicial approaches to implementation.

Putting non-judicial liability into practice

Three questions guide implementation.

What does the national system already provide, how can administrative liability operate, and how can tobacco-related costs be recovered?

01 / Self-assessment

Identify what the national system already provides

Review existing legal authority, institutions, sanctions, compensation arrangements and cost-recovery tools, then identify the gaps.

Explore details

Map legal mandates, responsible institutions, available sanctions, compensation arrangements, financial measures and implementation gaps.

02 / Administrative liability

How can liability operate beyond courts?

Where domestic law permits, competent authorities or tribunals may determine liability, impose administrative sanctions and provide or facilitate remedies.

Explore details

Consider administrative orders, penalties, licensing consequences, corrective measures and appeal safeguards.

03 / Cost recovery

How can governments recover attributable costs?

Estimate attributable costs, identify the legal basis for recovery and examine available mechanisms, including levies, fees and surcharges where legally available.

Explore details

Explore cost recovery methods, cost calculators and evidence that puts industry claims in context.

Implementation safeguard

Protect liability processes from tobacco-industry interference by identifying and managing conflicts of interest and industry links.

Use COI and Integrity Screening
The Article 19 journey

From treaty provision to practical implementation.

See how Article 19 implementation has developed alongside GGTC research, tools and convening on tobacco-industry liability.

Evidence and resources

Evidence, tools and guidance.

Browse GGTC and partner materials for Article 19, administrative liability, cost recovery and safeguards.

Showing 12 resources

Webinar

Tobacco Industry Accountability and Liability in the Time of COVID-19

View resource
Research

Estimating Tobacco-Attributable Public Costs

View resource
WHO FCTC

COP10 Decision on Re-establishing the Expert Group

View resource